Hospital bed replacement for acute care of children at home during the COVID-19 pandemic through a Hospital-in-the-Home programme.

OBJECTIVES: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we expanded our Hospital-in-the-Home (HITH) programme to increase capacity and manage COVID-19-positive children. We aimed to assess impact on overall HITH activity and COVID-19-positive outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: The largest paediatric HITH in Australasia, at The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne. PATIENTS: Children 0-18 years admitted to HITH during the pandemic. INTERVENTION: We developed a COVID-19 responsive service, and a guideline for COVID-19-positive patients. We compared overall activity prior to and during the pandemic, and COVID-19-positive admissions with different variants. MAIN OUTCOMES: We compared outcomes for all HITH patients before and during the pandemic, and for COVID-19-positive patients admitted first to hospital versus directly to HITH. RESULTS: HITH managed 7319 patients from March 2020 to March 2022, a 21% increase to previously, with a 132% telehealth increase. 421 COVID-19-positive patients (3 days-18.9 years) were admitted to HITH, predominantly high risk (63%) or moderately unwell (33%). Rates of childhood infection in Victoria, with proportion admitted to HITH were: original/alpha variant-3/100 000/month, 0.7%; delta-92/100 000/month, 0.8%; omicron-593/100 000/month, 0.3%. Eligible parents of only 29 of 71 (41%) high-risk children were vaccinated. COVID-19-positive children admitted directly to HITH were less likely to receive COVID-19-specific treatment than those admitted to hospital first (14 of 113 (12%) vs 33 of 46 (72%), p<0.001), reflecting more severe respiratory, but not other features in inpatients. 15 of 159 (10%) were readmitted to hospital, but none deteriorated rapidly. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-positive children at high risk or with moderate symptoms can be managed safely via HITH at home, the ideal place for children during the pandemic.

Student and Nature Interactions and Their Impact on Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Passive and active interactions with nature reduce stress, anxiety, and depression. Populations that experience increased stress often have fewer interactions with nature due to many factors. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has created a new stressor for all populations due to sickness, isolation, financial burdens, or other factors. University students were particularly impacted due to the change to online modalities, which isolated them from other students. To assess if any negative or other consequences were experienced and if nature factors could mitigate them, we examined how plant interactions affected university students (N = 353) in an online learning environment. Two modified Depression Anxiety Stress Surveys (DASS; Depression Anxiety Stress and Academic Stress, DASA) were administered over two semesters in 2020 to survey students on these interactions with nature. During the two semesters, most students experienced extremely severe self-reported mental health adversities. Further correlations between DASA scores and responses about nature interactions, home environments, plant exposure, and plant access showed that outdoor interactions were positively related to better self-reported mental health scores. However, the concerning and lingering effects of the pandemic were evidenced in our research as DASA scores increased across the two semesters. Nevertheless, going outdoors and interacting with nature brings some benefits that lessen the severity of depression, anxiety, and stress.

AGILE: a seamless phase I/IIa platform for the rapid evaluation of candidates for COVID-19 treatment: an update to the structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial letter.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent unmet clinical need for the identification of novel therapeutics for the treatment of COVID-19. A number of COVID-19 late phase trial platforms have been developed to investigate (often repurposed) drugs both in the UK and globally (e.g. RECOVERY led by the University of Oxford and SOLIDARITY led by WHO). There is a pressing need to investigate novel candidates within early phase trial platforms, from which promising candidates can feed into established later phase platforms. AGILE grew from a UK-wide collaboration to undertake early stage clinical evaluation of candidates for SARS-CoV-2 infection to accelerate national and global healthcare interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: AGILE is a seamless phase I/IIa platform study to establish the optimum dose, determine the activity and safety of each candidate and recommend whether it should be evaluated further. Each candidate is evaluated in its own trial, either as an open label single arm healthy volunteer study or in patients, randomising between candidate and control usually in a 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate. Each dose is assessed sequentially for safety usually in cohorts of 6 patients. Once a phase II dose has been identified, efficacy is assessed by seamlessly expanding into a larger cohort. AGILE is completely flexible in that the core design in the master protocol can be adapted for each candidate based on prior knowledge of the candidate (i.e. population, primary endpoint and sample size can be amended). This information is detailed in each candidate specific trial protocol of the master protocol. DISCUSSION: Few approved treatments for COVID-19 are available such as dexamethasone, remdesivir and tocilizumab in hospitalised patients. The AGILE platform aims to rapidly identify new efficacious and safe treatments to help end the current global COVID-19 pandemic. We currently have three candidate specific trials within this platform study that are open to recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2020-001860-27 14 March 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04746183  19 February 2021 ISRCTN reference: 27106947.